…Liability, the others being Cyprus, Malta, Romania and Ireland. Why aren’t those who oppose the introduction of Presumed Liability pointing to Romania as a shining beacon of liberty and freedom?…
…pasted from the official blog of the US Secretary of Transportation. If the Americans can do it, why can’t we? So here are a few other suggestions: Strict liability. As…
…evidence for this simply does not stack up. Finally we reach the part about Liability, she starts by accepting that cyclists are vulnerable on the road and that most accidents…
…robust regulation to ensure independent testing. This should also be backed up with strict annual testing of vehicles, to ensure they continue to meet acceptable pollution limits. The current MOT…
…Rule “will not, in itself, cause a person to be prosecuted, but may be used in evidence in court proceedings to establish liability”. Where does this leave vulnerable road users?…
…failure to comply with the Rule “will not, in itself, cause a person to be prosecuted, but may be used in evidence in court proceedings to establish liability”. It is…
…driver error. This is why there needs to be a clear hierarchy of liability, with those capable of causing the greatest harm taking a greater level of responsibility. However, we…
…liability in relation to road accidents, and urges local authorities to meet growing demand for high-quality walking and cycling infrastructure, extend 20mph speed limits in built-up areas and provide walking…
…the victim, and to avoid liability. Does this mean that we should all start to ride in ordinary clothes as a political statement? No, of course not. There are those…
…ongoing debate and research into the introduction of presumed liability in relation to road accidents, and urges local authorities to meet growing demand for high-quality walking and cycling infrastructure, extend…
© 2006 - 2024 the ubiquitous blog